Shall agree to review manuscripts in your relevance expertise research subjects.
Shall carry out a proper assessment in a timely manner.
Confidentiality of the peer review process and authors’ information has to be considered a high priority.
Read all the minute details of the manuscript along with all accompanying material, If anything is unclear please contact the Journal Editor.
If you seek any advice from our colleague for reviewing the manuscript, first take the approval from the journal editor to avoid the risk of confidentiality.
Content of the manuscripts you are reviewing shall not be used anywhere in full or partial for the credit of individual or organization.
Be Objective and constructive in report making, refrain from making any personal, defamatory or derogatory remarks. Should explain the judgments and support them with highly accurate evidence so that the editor can evaluate and shall be helpful to make constructive revision by the authors.
Reviewers able to should identify flaws in the design of the research, and in the analysis of interpretation of the result, highlighting the ethical concern about article and report to the journal editor.
The reviewer has the right to refuse to review if he is unable to conduct a fair and impartial review.
The Reviewer does not have the right to contact the authors directly without permission from the journal.
The Reviewer has the right to read the reviews from the other reviewers, if they are provided by the journal, he can improve his own understanding of the Subject or the decision made.
The reviewer should not review the manuscript of an author whom you know personally / professionally.